Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Parks v. McAdorey
as 24-2955
Petitioner: EDWARD F. PARKS
Respondent: JOHN MCADOREY, WARDEN
Parks v. Smith, et al.
as 24-1542
Petitioner: EDWARD F. PARKS
Respondent: MATHEW SMITH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, named as Ryan Thronell and others
Parks v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv08568
Petitioner: Edward F Parks
Respondent: Mathew Smith, Mohave, County of, Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parks v. Reyes
as 4:2022cv00544
Plaintiff: Edward F Parks
Defendant: Unknown Reyes, David Shinn, Mark Brnovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. Ryan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv03397
Defendant: Mark Brnovich, Unknown Devore, Core Civic and others
Plaintiff: Edward F Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Ryan et al
as 3:2018cv08084
Petitioner: Edward F Parks
Respondent: Charles Ryan, Richard Pratt and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edward F. Parks v. Charles Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv02953
Respondent: Department Of Corrections, Richard Pratt and Charles Ryan
Petitioner: Edward F Parks
Parks v. Attorney General of the State of Arizona
as 4:2017cv00553
Petitioner: Edward F Parks
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parks v. Mission et al
as 2:2017cv04162
Plaintiff: Edward F Parks
Defendant: Unknown Mission, Robert M Brutinel and Jim Gluer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Attorney General of Arizona We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv04570
Petitioner: Edward F Parks
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?