Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Ackerman v. Aramark et al
as 3:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
Aramark, David Drummond, William Reubart and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Espe v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Tammera Louise Espe
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McNeil v. ESP Executive Staff et al
as 3:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Michael McNeil
Defendant:
ESP Executive Staff, James Dzurenda, William Gitterre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aycock v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00088
Petitioner:
Devontay Aycock
Respondent:
State of Nevada and ESP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Earley v. Kitchen Staff ESP et al
as 2:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Marc A. Earley
Defendant:
Kitchen Staff ESP, Warden ESP, Lt. ESP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kokoski v. Bernales et al
as 3:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Dale Kokoski
Defendant:
Dr Bernales and ESP Medical Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rico-Torres v. Director of Nursing HDSP et al
as 2:2022cv01788
Plaintiff:
Javier Rico-Torres
Defendant:
Director of Nursing HDSP and Director of Nursing ESP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carl Edwards v. Nevada, State of, et al
as 22-16589
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL D. EDWARDS
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVADA, STATE OF, GITTERE, ESP Warden, FORD, Nevada Attorney General and others
Clyde Lewis v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 22-16547
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLYDE LEWIS, AKA Louis Randolph
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES DZURENDA, Director, NDOC, BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, Sr., Warden, SDCC, MINOR ADAMS, Asst. Warden, SDCC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
