Cases 1 - 10 of 355
Ammo A-Z LLC v. Zenith Firearms Incorporated
as 2:2024cv01177
Plaintiff:
Ammo A-Z LLC
Defendant:
Zenith Firearms Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
State of California, et al. v. United States Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms & Explosives, et al.
as 24-2701
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BRYAN MUEHLBERGER, FRANK BLACKWELL and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES, STEVEN DETTELBACH, in his official capacity as Director of ATF, DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Hoffman et al v. Bonta
as 3:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Hoffman, Chad Orrin, Jennifer Sensiba and others
Defendant:
Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Nguyen, et al. v. Bonta, et al.
as 24-2036
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE NGUYEN, DOMINIC BOGUSKI, JAY MEDINA and others
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California and ALLISON MENDOZA, in her capacity as the Director of the Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
Chambered Custom Firearms LLC et al v. Babcock
as 2:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Chambered Custom Firearms LLC and John Lamontagne
Defendant:
Kristina Babcock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
In Re: Non-Judicial Forfeiture Proceeding Involving Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives seizure of: Ninety-Two Assets Seized Under ATF Case Number 785040-22-0007
as 2:2024mc00010
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Not Yet Classified:
Non-Judicial Forfeiture Proceeding Involving Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives seizure of: Ninety-Two Assets Seized Under ATF Case Number 785040-22-0007
Humphrey v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, et al.
as 24-1328
Plaintiff:
DION KIRK HUMPHREY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES
Nelson, et al. v. Honolulu City and County
as 1:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Nelson, Corey Kahalawai, Kirk Kama and others
Defendant:
Honolulu County and Honolulu City and County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians v. Merrick Garland et al
as 5:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
TWENTY-NINE PALMS BAND OF MISSION INDIANS, and Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians a Federally Recognized Indian Tribe doing business as Twenty-Nine Palms Distribution
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Rhode, et al. v. Bonta
as 24-542
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KIM RHODE, GARY BRENNAN, CORY HENRY and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
