Cases 1 - 10 of 448
Buchanan v. Gamboa
as 2:2024at00722
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Buchanan
Respondent:
Martin Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Buchanan v. Gamboa
as 2:2024cv01632
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Buchanan
Respondent:
Martin Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bohan v. Gamboa et al
as 3:2024cv00890
Plaintiff:
Paulette Bohan
Defendant:
Adam Gamboa and Gamboa Law Firm, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Patacsil, et al. v. Google LLC, et al.
as 24-3387
Plaintiff:
NAPOLEON PATACSIL, individually, and on behalf of other persons similarly situated, GEORGE JACK, MARK CARSON and others
Appellant:
JOHN ANDREN, MATTHEW LILLEY and JOSEPH S. ST. JOHN
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC, XXVI HOLDINGS INC and ALPHABET INC.
Bibbs v. Melton et al
as 3:2024cv03072
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Bibbs
Defendant:
K. Melton, D. Moyer, V. Lizaola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garces v. Gamboa, et al.
as 24-3166
Plaintiff:
LUIS MANUEL GARCES
Defendant:
M. GAMBOA, KERN KLARK, D. HERNANDEZ and others
Smith v. Gamboa, et al.
as 24-2790
Petitioner:
RONALD J. SMITH
Respondent:
MARTIN GAMBOA, Warden and ROB BONTA, Attorney General, State of California
Coffer v. Reyes et al
as 3:2024cv02051
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Christopher Coffer
Defendant:
Officer Reyes, Deleon and R. Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gamboa-Molina #227424 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Armando Gamboa-Molina
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Corrections, Arizona Board of Executive Clemency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Valles v. Newsom et al
as 1:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Frank Valles
Defendant:
Galvin Newsom, State Water Resources Control Board, Martin Gamboa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
