Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Global Linguist Solutions, LLC, et al v. Steven Herfi, et al
as 17-72535
Petitioner:
GLOBAL LINGUIST SOLUTIONS, LLC and ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
STEVEN HERFI and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Global Linguist Solutions, LLC, et al v. Steven Herfi, et al
as 17-72535
Petitioner:
GLOBAL LINGUIST SOLUTIONS, LLC and ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
STEVEN HERFI and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Global Linguist Solutions, LLC, et al v. Abdulraouf Abdelmeged, et al
as 17-72516
Petitioner:
GLOBAL LINGUIST SOLUTIONS, LLC and ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
ABDULRAOUF ABDELMEGED and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Daloy v. Global Linguist Solutions LLC et al
as 3:2014cv01927
Defendant:
Global Linguist Solutions LLC , KMS Solutions LLC and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Hana Mustafa Daloy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-36158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alfred Zaklit et al v. Global Linguist Solutions LLC et al
as 2:2013cv08654
Defendant:
AECOM Services Inc, Does, DynCorp International LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mokhtar Farag, Hany Shaker and Alfred Zaklit
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-35987
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Marlene Ziya v. Global Linguistic Solution, et al
as 12-35348
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARLENE ZIYA
Defendant - Appellee:
GLOBAL LINGUISTIC SOLUTION, THOMAS/WRIGHT INCORPORATED and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
