Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Woodhouse v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-3070
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, A resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands, Havensight Capital L.L.C., A U.S. Virgin Islands corporation
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR., DISTRICT JUDGE, Acting as a Government Official, a California citizen, R. GARY KLAUSNER, DISTRICT JUDGE and others
Universal Meditech, Inc. et al v. City of Reedley et al
as 1:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Universal Meditech, Inc. and David He
Defendant:
City of Reedley, Jeremy Harrison, Jesalyn Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott York v. USA, et al
as 23-55122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT YORK, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, (Unknown Officers, Agents, and Employees Acting Under the Direction Thereof), a department of the federal government of the United States and others
Benjamin Woodhouse v. United States Government, et al
as 22-55636
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, A Citizen of the United States, Resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, STANLEY BLUMENFELD, Jr., US District Court Judge, R. GARY KLAUSNER, United States District Court Judge and others
Benjamin Woodhouse, et al v. United States Government, et al
as 22-55598
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, A Citizen of the United States, Resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands and HAVENSIGHT CAPITAL L.L.C., a U.S. Virgin Islands corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, STANLEY BLUMENFELD, Jr., US District Court Judge, GIBSON DUNN, INC., A California Corporation and others
Benjamin Woodhouse, et al v. United States Government, et al
as 22-55463
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, A Citizen of the United States, Resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands and HAVENSIGHT CAPITAL L.L.C., a U.S. Virgin Islands corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, STANLEY BLUMENFELD, Jr., US District Court Judge, GIBSON DUNN, INC., A California Corporation and others
Jester v. D.O.J. et al
as 3:2021cv07390
Petitioner:
Daniel G. Jester
Respondent:
D.O.J., A.D.A. and Government Officials
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Arizonans for Fair Elections, et al v. Katie Hobbs, et al
as 20-15719
Defendant / Appellee:
SADIE JO BINGHAM, Gila County Recorder, LELIE HOFFMAN, Yavapai County Recorder, KRISTI BLAIR, Mohave County Recorder and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDI L. TURK, an individual, ARIZONANS FOR FAIR ELECTIONS, AZAN, an Arizona nonprofit corporation and ARIZONANS FED UP WITH FAILING HEALTHCARE, Healthcare Rising AZ, an Arizona nonprofit corporation
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA
Amicus Curiae:
GOLDWATER INSTITUTE, KAREN FANN, PRESIDENT OF THE ARIZONA STATE SENATE, CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER and others
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-15044
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, RYAN D. MCCARTHY, senior official performing the duties of the Secretary of the Army and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF VERMONT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Amicus Curiae:
FORMER U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, EL PASO COUNTY, FORMER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS and others
State of Washington v. Trump et al
as 2:2019cv01502
Defendant:
Matthew Donovan, US Department of the Interior, US Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
State of Washington
Amicus Curiae:
Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, National Immigration Law Center, Amici Curiae Former U.S. Government Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
