Cases 1 - 10 of 1,655
Hamilton v. Dolsen et al
as 3:2024cv00797
Plaintiff:
Michael Hamilton
Defendant:
Susan Dolsen, United States Postal Service and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Thompson et al v. State of Montana et al
as 2:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Peter Thompson and Cattail Creek Subdivision-Phase II
Defendant:
State of Montana, City of Bozeman, Cattail Creek Community Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Langworthy v. Perky, et al.
as 24-2579
Plaintiff:
GENEVA LANGWORTHY
Defendant:
CAROLINA PERKY, LAURA HAMILTON, PABLO VILLARREAL and others
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Nicholes et al
as 2:2024cv00915
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Andre Nicholes, Sylvia Hamilton and William Bryant Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hamilton v. East Oahu Marine LLC
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Emily Hamilton
Defendant:
East Oahu Marine LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Hamilton v. Teague et al
as 6:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Allen Hamilton
Defendant:
Peter Teague, Walmart Albany Oregon and Michelle Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Whipsaw Sport Fishing Inc.
as 1:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Emily Hamilton
Defendant:
Whipsaw Sport Fishing Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
