Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Gilmore v. Deputy Chief Hass et al
as 2:2024cv00247
Petitioner:
Corves K. Gilmore
Defendant:
The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Respondent:
Deputy Chief Hass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tillman v. Washington Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv01835
Plaintiff:
Lamone L Tillman
Defendant:
Washington Department of Corrections, Hass, Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Hancock Jr. et al
as 3:2023cv02025
Plaintiff:
David Owens
Defendant:
John F Hancock Jr., Larry Jahn, Randy Hasse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
In re Naturalization Ceremony 6/30/2023
as 3:2023mc80168
In Re:
Naturalization Ceremony, Mohammad Ebrahim Ahmadi, Naqibullah Ahmadzai and others
AZ ATM Expert LLC v. Jory LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00640
Plaintiff:
AZ ATM Expert LLC
Defendant:
Jory LLC an Oregon limited liability company doing business as Jory Payments, Michael Hass and Erica Hass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Hass v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Audra Hass
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hass et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00818
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Steven Hass and Joni Hass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Hass et al
as 6:2020cv00934
Defendant:
Simply Gains Inc. and Erik J. Hass
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Bowman v. Hass, et al.
as 1:2020cv00169
Plaintiff:
Justin Daniel Bowman
Defendant:
Jerome County, Adam Ondo, Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hassing v. Kim et al
as 3:2018cv05936
Plaintiff:
Brandie Hassing
Defendant:
Richard Y Kim and Sung J Kim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
