Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02273
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02097
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00132
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Karmjit Kaur v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-72271
Petitioner: KARMJIT KAUR, AKA Harjinder Kaur, AKA Harjinder Kaur Dosanjh
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Karmjit Kaur v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-72271
Petitioner: KARMJIT KAUR, AKA Harjinder Kaur, AKA Harjinder Kaur Dosanjh
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
North Atlantic Operating Company, Inc. et al v. Manish Nahal et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv02234
Defendant: Aboslute Smoke Shop, DOE Harjinder Kaur Bhasin, D K Import House and others
Plaintiff: National Tobacco Company LP and North Atlantic Operating Company, Inc.
Bhupinder Singh, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-71168
Petitioner: BHUPINDER PAL SINGH and HARJINDER KAUR
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Mangal Singh, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-70935
Petitioner: MANGAL SINGH and HARJINDER KAUR
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00866
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009at00370
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?