Cases 1 - 10 of 663
In re: Naturalization Ceremony 06/25/2024
as 3:2024mc80145
Not Yet Classified:
Leonardo Mir Norouzi, Luis Alberto Angeles, Humberto Topete and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00899
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
United States of America v. April et al
as 3:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kathleen April, Arthur E. Bailey, James M. Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Jack Richter v. KRG Trading, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03622
Plaintiff:
Jack Richter
Defendant:
KRG Trading, Inc., Kai-Jhen Huang, Z&Q International Trading Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Campos et al v. Arizona Board of Regents et al
as 2:2024cv00987
Plaintiff:
Aida Esmeralda Campos, Amy O'Neill, Autumn Byars and others
Defendant:
Arizona Board of Regents a constitutionally created body corporate doing business as Arizona State University and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03375
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
