Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Estate of Paulette J. Adkins v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 3:2020cv00115
Defendant:
Newrez LLC and The Bank of New York Mellon
Plaintiff:
Estate of Paulette J. Adkins
City of Torrance v. Hi-Shear Corporation
as 2:2017cv07732
Defendant:
Hi-Shear Corporation and Hi-Shear Corporation a Delaware corporation doing business as LISI Aerospace
Plaintiff:
City of Torrance
3Rd Party Defendant:
Pat Simmons Golf Company, EFCO, Inc a Pennsylvania corporation doing business as Erie Press Systems, Craig Frudenfeld and others
Cross Defendant:
Magellan, Middleton, Inc, Karla Frudenfeld, Wendi Frudenfeld and others
Counter Defendant:
Robinson Helicopter Company, Inc. and Robinson Helicopter Company, Incorporated
Counter Claimant:
Esterline Technologies Corporation, Recreational Vans, Inc, Lyman E Eddy Company and others
Cross Claimant:
DASCO Engineering Corporation
Intervenor:
Federal Insurance Company and Safeco Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Kevin Miniter v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 11-56865
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN MINITER, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, J. ADKINS, Officer (# 35881), individual and others
James Pobursky, et al v. Madera County, et al
as 11-15130
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES S. POBURSKY and WANDA POBURSKY
Defendant - Appellee:
MADERA COUNTY, DOC'S TOWING AND TRANSPORT, CLIFTON GINN, in his individual capacity and others
Kevin Miniter v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2010cv05826
Defendant:
Officer J. Adkins, City of Los Angeles, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Miniter
Pobursky, et al. v. Madera County, et al.
as 1:2007cv00611
Plaintiff:
James S Pobursky and Wanda Pobursky
Defendant:
Madera County, Sheriff's Department of Madera County, Madera County District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
