Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Pamela Bennett, et al v. Cielo Homeowners Association, et al
as 21-55550
Defendant / Appellee: THE JUDGE LAW FIRM, A law corporation, DAVID MANGIKYAN, JAMES A. JUDGE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES DAVIS BENNETT and PAMELA RAE BENNETT
Pamela Bennett, et al v. Cielo Homeowners Association,, et al
as 20-55576
Defendant / Appellee: THE JUDGE LAW FIRM, A law corporation, DAVID MANGIKYAN, DOES, 1-10, Inclusive and others
Plaintiff: JAMES DAVIS BENNETT
Plaintiff / Appellant: PAMELA RAE BENNETT
USA v. James Bennett
as 17-56737
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES DAVIS BENNETT
USA v. James Bennett
as 17-55625
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES DAVIS BENNETT
Bennett v. USA
as 3:2015cv00893
Petitioner: James J. Bennett
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Bennett et al v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv01923
Plaintiff: James Davis Bennett and Pamela Bennett
Defendant: United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00010
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
James Davis Bennett v. United States of America
as 8:2014cv01757
Petitioner: James Davis Bennett
Respondent: United States of America
Unknown: Diana L Pauli
Bennett v. Feathers et al
as 3:2014cv01667
Plaintiff: James J. Bennett
Defendant: Warden Feathers and Charles E. Samuels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
James Davis Bennett v. Jaspal Dhaliwal, MD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv04697
Plaintiff: James Davis Bennett
Defendant: E. Casino, Jaspal Dhaliwal, Does and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?