Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Pecchenino, et al. v. Britt, et al,
as 1:2022cv00337
Plaintiff:
Treasea Pecchenino and Amy Convington
Defendant:
Benjamin Britt, United Parcel Service, Inc., UPS Ground Freight, Inc.dba UPS Freight and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Implant Seminars, Inc. v. Ho Lee et al
as 3:2019cv00817
Defendant:
Samuel Soon Ho Lee, International Academy of Dental Implantology, LLC, John Does 1 through 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Implant Seminars, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 la
Stout v. City of Tukwila et al
as 2:2018cv01687
Defendant:
Officer Christopher Backus, City of Tukwila, Tukwila Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
a single person Christopher M Stout and Christopher M Stout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lee et al v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. et al
as 3:2011cv00993
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. and John Does 1 through 3
Plaintiff:
Melissa Lee, Ruby Jane Lee and Brandon Mullen-Bagby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Percy Bacon v. Randy Laswell, et al
as 10-16824
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PERCY LAVAE BACON
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY LASWELL, North Las Vegas Police Department Officer and JOHN DOE, 1 through 3, North Las Vegas Police Department Officers
Spry v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2010cv05558
Plaintiff:
Ahsson Spry
Defendant:
Pierce County, Pierce County Sheriff's Department, Pierce County Sheriff Internal Affairs Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Spry v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2009cv05097
Plaintiff:
Ahsson Spry
Defendant:
Pierce County, Pierce County Sheriff's Department, Pierce County Sheriff Internal Affairs Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
De Las Heras v. McMinnville School District et al
as 3:2008cv00515
Plaintiff:
Cindy De Las Heras
Defendant:
McMinnville School District and John Does 1 through 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
