Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Rune Kraft v. Valerie Fairbank, et al
as 23-16048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUNE KRAFT
Defendant / Appellee:
VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, M MARGARET MCKEOWN, JOHN F WALTER and others
Kraft v. Fairbank et al
as 2:2023cv00450
Plaintiff:
Rune Kraft
Defendant:
Valerie Baker Fairbank, M Margaret McKeown, John F Walter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv01221
Plaintiff:
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission
Defendant:
United States, Merrick B Garland, Mary Murguia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Walters v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017at00450
Plaintiff:
John Keith Walters
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Walters v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv00778
Plaintiff:
John Keith Walters
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Walters v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv01967
Plaintiff:
John F. Walters
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Roberto Barajas v. United States of America Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv03225
Defendant:
Daniel B. Ackerman, Hilda Avila, Adam Jason Axelrad and others
Plaintiff:
Roberto Barajas
Georkeshia Denise Campbell v. John F Walter et al
as 2:2013cv00104
Plaintiff:
Georkeshia Denise Campbell
Defendant:
Shannon Reilly and John F Walter
Daniel Dydzak v. Tani Cantil-Sakauye, et al
as 12-56960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, JOYCE L. KENNARD, MARVIN R. BAXTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
