Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Rajaee v. Davis et al
as 3:2024cv00550
Plaintiff:
Ashkan Rajaee
Defendant:
Joshua Paul Lintz, Talentcrowd, LLC, Melissa Garcia and others
Rajaee v. Davis et al
as 3:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Ashkan Rajaee
Defendant:
Tyler Brandon Davis, Scott Carpenter, J. Douglas Kirk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Santana v. Hemmerling et al
as 3:2021cv00406
Defendant:
Mara W. Elliott, Carolina Mendoza and John C. Hemmerling
Plaintiff:
Joshua Paul Santana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Imperial Urban Housing, LP. v. Santana
as 3:2021cv00382
Defendant:
Joshua Paul Santana
Plaintiff:
Imperial Urban Housing, LP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joshua Paul Falk
as 3:2017ad00105
In Re:
Joshua Paul Falk
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Dotis et al v. Stateless et al
as 5:2016cv06206
Plaintiff:
Demetrios Dotis and Vickie Dotis
Defendant:
Stateless, Chris James, Gerard Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Doug Benson v. David Joshua Paul et al
as 2:2015cv06218
Plaintiff:
Doug Benson
Defendant:
Alex Campbell, Does, Four Twenty Partners, LLC and others
Munk v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 3:2013cv01842
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joshua Paul Munk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
USA v. Joshua Fauncher
as 11-50174
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSHUA VINCENT FAUNCHER, AKA Fauncher Alfaro, AKA Josh Alfaro, AKA Joshua Alfaro, AKA Joshua Paul Alfaro, AKA Joshua VP Alfaro, AKA Alfaro Fauncher, AKA Joshua Fauncher, AKA Joshua Paul Fauncher, AKA Joshua Vincent Paul Al Fauncher, AKA Jay, AKA Joshua V.
Nasser et al v. Business Benefits, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00166
Defendant:
Business Benefits, Inc., Business Benefits, Inc., Sue Ellen Miatke and others
Plaintiff:
Sheila Nasser and Rudolph Backer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
