Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Ball v. Schmidt
as 6:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Reginald K. Ball
Defendant:
Desiree Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slavick v. Frink et al
as 2:2021cv00208
Plaintiff:
Chris Slavick
Defendant:
Unknown Ramos, Jeanette Baltero, E Aguilar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen JR., II v. Beard et al
as 3:2016cv02713
Plaintiff:
Columbus Allen JR., II
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, J. Clark Kelso, Scott Kernan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodson v. Ortiz et al
as 3:2015cv01285
Plaintiff:
Thomas R. Woodson
Defendant:
Ortiz, Orduna, M. Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooks v. Gomez et al
as 3:2014cv01855
Plaintiff:
Vernon D. Hooks
Defendant:
J. Gomez, D. Hjerpe, K. Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis Martel v. E. Estock, et al
as 14-55520
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS MARTEL
Defendant - Appellee:
E. ESTOCK, Primary Care Provider and K. BALL, Chief Medical Officer
Louis Debose v. G. Janda, et al
as 13-56669
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS LOVELL DEBOSE
Defendant - Appellee:
G. J. JANDA, Chief Deputy Warden, J. KELLERMAN, Correctional Captain, R. DELA CRUZ, Correctional Lieutenant and others
Paul Adams v. USDC-CASD
as 13-72895
:
In re: PAUL ADAMS
Petitioner:
PAUL ADAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Real Party In Interest:
AL LOPEZ, Doctor Medical Provider, K. BALL, CMO Physician, Health Care Manager, D. HJERPE, Chief Physician and Surgeon and others
Debose v. Janda et al
as 3:2013cv01005
Plaintiff:
Louis Lovell Debose
Defendant:
G. J. Janda, J. Kellerman, R. Dela Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maurice Olivier v. L. Scribner, et al
as 12-56718
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE P. OLIVIER, AKA Maurice Pierre Olivier
Defendant - Appellee:
L. E. SCRIBNER, Warden, LARRY SMALL, Warden, L. S. MCEWEN, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
