Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Holaday v. SSA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv01870
Plaintiff: Kim I Holaday
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416
United States of America v. Kim I Yang
as 2:2013cv08407
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Kim I Yang
Montgomery Akers v. Jacquelyn Rokusek, et al
as 11-55144
Plaintiff - Appellant: MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee: JACQUELYN E. ROKUSEK, Special Agent, Office of the US Attorney, NICHOLAS VOULGARIS, Special Agent, JAMES KESZEI, Special Agent, FBI and others
Cyrus Kim, I v. Kayla Stahman, et al
as 10-35442
Plaintiff - Appellant: CYRUS YOO KIM, I
Defendant - Appellee: KAYLA STAHMAN and THOMAS S. ZILLY
Cyrus Kim, I v. Federal Way Post Office Postma, et al
as 09-36133
Plaintiff - Appellant: CYRUS YOO KIM, I
Defendant: FEDERAL WAY POST OFFICE POSTMASTER
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cyrus Kim, I v. City of Federal Way
as 09-35504
Plaintiff - Appellant: CYRUS YOO KIM, I
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Akers v. Rolwsek et al
as 2:2009cv00448
Plaintiff: Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant: Jacquelyn E. Rolwsek, James Keszei, Janine Shields and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Cyrus Kim, I v. Targa Real Estate Service, Inc, et al
as 09-35054
Plaintiff - Appellant: CYRUS YOO KIM, I
Defendant - Appellee: TARGA REAL ESTATE SERVICE, INC, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY and ABT TOWING OF FEDERAL WAY, INC
Montgomery Akers v. Jacquelyn Rokusek, et al
as 08-56413
Plaintiff - Appellant: MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee: NICHOLAS VOULGARIS, Special Agent, JAMES KESZEI, Special Agent, FBI, KIM I. MARTIN, Assistant U.S. Attorney and others
Akers v. Uratil et al
as 4:2008cv02691
Plaintiff: Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant: Kathryn H. Uratil, Kim I. Martin, Michael Shute and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?