Cases 1 - 10 of 830
Black v. Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC et al
as 3:2024cv08064
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Epic Games, Inc., Nintendo of America Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Melissa Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Shankar v. Microsoft Corporation
as 24-6771
Plaintiff:
RAGHAVENDRAN SHANKAR
Defendant:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Harris v. Skanska USA Building, Inc., et al.
as 24-6660
Defendant:
BALFOUR BEATTY CONSTRUCTION, LLC, SKANSKA USA BUILDING, INC., MICROSOFT CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTE HARRIS
Stanford v. Microsoft et al
as 2:2024cv01738
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Cisco Systems Inc, Department of Defense and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Stanford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02801
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Doe, et al. v. Github, Inc., et al.
as 24-6136
Respondent:
OPENAI GLOBAL, LLC, OPENAI HOLDINGS, LLC, OPENAI STARTUP FUND GP I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and others
Petitioner:
J. DOE, 1 and J. DOE, 2-5, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2024cv01593
Plaintiff:
Ms. Janet Sihler and Charlene Bavencoff
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01511
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01512
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
