Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Normann v. Ryan et al
as 4:2019cv00264
Defendant:
Walter Hensley, Alfred Ramos, Unknown Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Normann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Morman v. Director of Corrections and Re
as 17-55439
Petitioner - Appellant:
FREDERICK JEROME MORMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
DIRECTOR OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
Morman v. Dyer et al
as 3:2016cv01523
Plaintiff:
Wade Anthony Morman
Defendant:
Michael Dyer, Quintero, E. Heller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Jerome Morman v. Director of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 2:2016cv01437
Respondent:
Director of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Petitioner:
Frederick Jerome Morman
United States of America v. Adams
as 2:2013mc00137
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Roland Adams and J.P. Morman Chase National Corporate Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Bankert et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 4:2013cv04003
Plaintiff:
Vondell Bankert , Carolyn Cahill , Virgil L. Lienhard and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC , Sanofi-Aventis U.S., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Geringer v. State of Oregon Department of Revenue et al
as 1:2013cv01287
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Geringer
Defendant:
Morman Church Temple, Organizations of Johovah Witness, Religious Organizations and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Lewis Harry, Jr. v. Arizona, State of, et al
as 12-15111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEWIS A. HARRY, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
ARIZONA, STATE OF, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ANNA JACOBS and others
Harry v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2009cv00507
Plaintiff:
Lewis A Harry, Jr
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Corrections, Anna Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
