Cases 1 - 10 of 32
York Holding, Ltd. et al v. Waid
as 2:2023cv02029
Intervenor Defendant:
York Holding, Ltd. and York United, Inc.
Defendant:
Frederick Waid
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Mr. William A Batchelor, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00413
Plaintiff:
Mr. William G. Roche, Jr.
Defendant:
Lost Resolution LLC, F/V Resolution LLC, Paul Krawczyk and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Roche v. Last Resolution LLC
as 2:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
Mr. William G. Roche, Jr. and William G Roche, Jr
Defendant:
Everett Joseph Lindholm, Paul Krawczyk, Last Resolution LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1916 Marine Contract Actions
Iske v. H.D.S.P. et al
as 2:2022cv01035
Plaintiff:
Harlan Iske
Defendant:
H.D.S.P., H.D.S.P. Medical Staff, Sonya Corriton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramori Rogers, Sr. v. Gallion, et al
as 22-15939
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAMORI VAUGHN ROGERS, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
GALLION, Unknown; named as S.I.S. Gallion, S.I.S., "Investigator" at USP Tucson, AMANDA STANGL, named as Case Manager Amanda Stangl, E-1 Case Manager at USP Tucson, BYLER, Unknown; named as Counselor Mr. Byler, E-1-E-2 Counselor at USP Tucson and others
Danny Varner v. Felicia Ponce et al
as 2:2021cv04878
Respondent:
Dr BOP, Felicia Ponce, Dr Hosseini and others
Petitioner:
Danny Varner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Paatalo et al v. Lincoln County et al
as 6:2021cv00117
Plaintiff:
Ms. Jenny Paatalo, Mr. William J. Paatalo, Jenny Paatalo and others
Defendant:
JoAnn McCarthy and Lincoln County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv01276
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00379
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
