Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv09100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Margulis v. Zillow Group Inc
as 2:2022cv01736
Plaintiff:
Ryan Margulis
Defendant:
Zillow Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins et al v. Zillow Group Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01282
Plaintiff:
Natalie Perkins and Kenneth Hasson
Defendant:
Zillow Group Inc and Microsoft Corporation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Jamie Huber, David Kauffman, Mark Conlisk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Norman Herterich v. Mary Wiss, et al
as 21-16746
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORMAN BARTSCH HERTERICH
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY E. WISS, ROBERT L. DONDERO, SANDRA L. MARGULIES and others
Herterich v. Wiss et al
as 4:2021cv04078
Defendant:
Ming William Chin, Tani Gorre Cantil-Sakauye, Diana Becton and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Bartsch Herterich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Margulies et al
as 4:2020cv08225
Defendant:
John Whitson, Johnathan Goodfellow and Sandra L. Margulies
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman Herterich v. Ernest Goldsmith, et al
as 20-17197
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT L. DONDERO, MING WILLIAM CHIN, KATHLEEN BANKE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORMAN HERTERICH and NORMAN BARTSCH HERTERICH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
