Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Montgomery Ray v. Dzogchen Shri Singha Foundation USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00233
Defendant:
Choying Rabjam, Dzogchen Shri Singha Foundation USA, Inc., Dzogchen Shri Singha of Portland and others
Plaintiff:
Rachel Marie Montgomery Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
David Webb v. State of Washington, et al
as 22-36008
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID Q. WEBB
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, ROBERT WATSON FERGUSON, Washington State Attorney General, KITSAP COUNTY GOVERNMENT and others
Not Classified By Court:
JOHN GESE
Webb et al v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2022cv05448
Plaintiff:
David Q Webb
Defendant:
State of Washington, Robert Watson Ferguson, Kitsap County Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Webb v. USDC-WAWTA
as 22-70079
Not Classified By Court:
In re: DAVID Q. WEBB, STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HELATH SERVICES, KITSAP COUNTY GOVERNMENT and others
Petitioner:
DAVID Q. WEBB
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, TACOMA
Webb v. State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services et al
as 3:2021cv05761
Plaintiff:
David Q Webb
Defendant:
State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services, Kitsap County Government, Chad M Enright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollyvale Rental Holdings, LLC v. Idriff Sullivan et al
as 2:2017cv07470
Defendant:
Does, Mary Montgomery and Idriff Sullivan
Plaintiff:
Hollyvale Rental Holdings, LLC
Nance v. Bremerton Police Dept., et al.
as 3:2008cv05039
Plaintiff:
James Nolen Nance, Jr.
Defendant:
Bremerton Police Dept, Kelly Marie Montgomery and David LaCross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery et al v. Sears, Roebuck & Co
as 2:2007cv01005
Plaintiff:
Mary Montgomery and Steven Montgomery
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
