Cases 1 - 10 of 1,166
Persin v. Mathews et al
as 1:2025cv00001
Defendant:
Funding Force, LLC and Clint R. Mathews
Plaintiff:
Ginette Paonessa Persin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Marizza v. Amarel et al
as 3:2024cv00601
Defendant:
A. A. Hodge, Amarel and L. Fluer
Plaintiff:
Mathew Marizza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hovious v. Naphcare et al
as 3:2024cv00594
Defendant:
Rex Weeks, Bryan Romero, Micheal Trebian and others
Plaintiff:
Mathew Hovious
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California
as 24-7747
Real Party In Interest:
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY and PG&E CORPORATION
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Petitioner:
MATHEW L. TYLER
Willette L. Mathews v. Carolyn Colvin
as 5:2024cv02620
Plaintiff:
WIllette L. Mathews
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Phelps v. Ada County Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lee Phelps
Defendant:
Robert Koller, James Pickard, Ada County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
United States of America v. Hevener
as 24-7325
Defendant:
GREGORY HEVENER, Greg H. Heverner, Greg Harry Hevener and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(PS) McCaster v. Franchise Tax Board et al
as 2:2024cv03161
Defendant:
Franchise Tax Board, Kern County Assessor-Recorder's Office and Jonathon Chen
Plaintiff:
Mathew-Allen McCaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv07938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00387
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2ag Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
