Cases 1 - 10 of 58
McGowan v. NetApp, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv04291
Plaintiff:
Neil McGowan
Defendant:
NetApp, Inc., Henri Richard, Elizabeth O'Callahan and others
McCowan v. Johnson
as 4:2023cv01680
Petitioner:
Raymond B. McCowan
Respondent:
R. C. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
R. White v. Jacqueline Seabrooks, et al
as 22-56172
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R. WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
JACQUELINE SEABROOKS, GLEAM DAVIS, PHILIP BROCK and others
Mapes v. Hart et al
as 2:2022cv01642
Plaintiff:
Charles Russell Mapes
Defendant:
Unknown Hart, A Moore, Brin Hoffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Whitehead et al
as 2:2022cv01146
Plaintiff:
Dominique Brown
Defendant:
Chuck Whitehead, Manuel Rubalcaba, Carlos Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
R. White v. USDC-CALA
as 22-70078
Not Classified By Court:
In re: R. WHITE, JACQUELINE SEABROOKS, GLEAM DAVIS and others
Petitioner:
R. WHITE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Johanna Immelt v. Dee Sharp, et al
as 22-35249
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHANNA M. IMMELT
Defendant / Appellee:
DEE SHARP, in her official capacity as Program Director and TAMBRA MCCOWAN, in her official capacity as Professional Licensing Manager
Defendant:
STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING REAL ESTATE APPRAISER PROGRAM
Dominique Brown v. Burgess McCowan, et al
as 21-17071
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOMINIQUE BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
BURGESS MCCOWAN, KATE LOUDENSLAGEL and MANUEL RUBACALBA
Brown v. McCowan et al
as 2:2021cv01898
Plaintiff:
Dominique Brown
Defendant:
Burgess McCowan, Kate Loudenslagel and Manuel Rubacalba
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
R. White v. Jacqueline Seabrooks, et al
as 2:2021cv08528
Plaintiff:
R. White
Defendant:
Jacqueline Seabrooks, Gleam Davis, Philip Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
