Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Leachman v. Parisian et al
as 1:2014cv00045
Plaintiff:
James H. Leachman
Defendant:
Edward F. Parisian, Michael S. Black, Michael R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cabello v. Jones et al
as 3:2012cv02259
Defendant:
Whitney P. Boise, Columbia County, Thomas H. Edmonds and others
Plaintiff:
Archie Cabello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo I, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 12-16539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLOVERDALE RANCHERIA OF POMO INDIANS OF CALIFORNIA, a Federally-recognized Indian Tribe, JAVIER MARTINEZ, SARAH GOODWIN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior, DONALD "DEL" LAVERDURE, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs, MICHAEL S. BLACK, Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Greene et al v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A
as 3:2010cv03466
Plaintiff:
Irasema E. Greene , Karyn Rae Winn , Jarrod D. Osborne and others
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank N.A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California et al v. Salazar et al
as 5:2010cv01605
Plaintiff:
Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California , Javier Martinez , Sarah Goodwin and others
Defendant:
Kenneth L. Salazar, Larry Echo Hawk, Michael S. Black and others
Intervenor_dft:
Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California et al v. Salazar et al
as 3:2010cv01605
Plaintiff:
Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California , Javier Martinez , Sarah Goodwin and others
Defendant:
Kenneth L. Salazar, Larry Echo Hawk, Michael S. Black and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Cintas Corporation v. Adams et al
as 3:2006cv05114
Petitioner:
Cintas Corporation
Respondent:
Randall Adams, Kevin Beal, Jason Boman and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
