Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Clark v. Unknown Party et al
as 4:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
Michael Stanley Clark
Defendant:
Unknown Party and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Clark v. Unknown Party
as 4:2023cv00032
Petitioner:
Michael Stanley Clark
Respondent:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Clark v. Unknown Parties
as 4:2022cv00084
Petitioner:
Michael Stanley Clark
Respondent:
Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Arthur v. United States of America et al
as 3:2020cv01705
Plaintiff:
Peter Arthur
Defendant:
Michael Stanley Reynolds, DOES 1 through 50 and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Baumgartner et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2020cv02446
Plaintiff:
Lucretia Walton, Denise Key, Leroy Fields and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Progressive Solutions, Inc. v. Michael Stanley, et al
as 18-16492
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PROGRESSIVE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL STANLEY and CITY OF OAKLAND
Progressive Solutions, Inc. v. Michael Stanley, et al
as 18-15946
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PROGRESSIVE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL STANLEY and CITY OF OAKLAND
Progressive Solutions, Inc. v. Michael Stanley, et al.,
as 3:2016cv04805
Plaintiff:
Progressive Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael Stanley and City of Oakland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
USA v. Michael Kaplan
as 15-10241
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL STANLEY KAPLAN, MD
Yaqub et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03161
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a/ GlaxoSmithKline and GlaxoSmithKlein LLC
Plaintiff:
Yaqub Yaqub , Arthur Shaw , Inge Shay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
