Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Clark v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv01665
Plaintiff:
Renee N. Clark
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Smith v. Office of Children Service (OCS) et al
as 3:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Din Ogan Shango Smith
Defendant:
Office of Children Service (OCS), Alferd Britz, Leslie Johnston-Dowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alejandro Prado v. Gary Swarthout, et al
as 19-15985
Defendant:
HAMMOND, Appeals Examiner, J. JIMENEZ, Lieutenant, ALLEAN, Appeals Examiner and others
Defendant / Appellee:
D. BLACKWELL, Lieutenant, E. ARNOLD, Deputy Warden, GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEJANDRO PRADO
Prado v. Swarthout et al
as 2:2015cv01866
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Prado
Defendant:
Gary Swarthout, E. Arnold, G. Matteson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Applegate v. Clark et al
as 1:2015at00087
Plaintiff:
Brian C. Applegate
Defendant:
N. Clark , A. Graves , M. Caviness and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Applegate v. Clark, et al.
as 1:2015cv00207
Plaintiff:
Brian C. Applegate
Defendant:
N. Clark , A. Graves , M. Caviness and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Burgos v. Fox et al
as 2:2014cv01952
Plaintiff:
Richard Manuel Burgos
Defendant:
K. Fox, Aisha F. Muhammad, R. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgos v. Dowling et al
as 2:2014cv01914
Plaintiff:
Richard Manuel Burgos
Defendant:
Raymond Dowling, Paul Medina, N Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Strayhorn et al
as 3:2014cv01665
Plaintiff:
Toney A. White, III
Defendant:
D. Strayhorn, J. Cariman, Daniel Paramo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Sandy et al
as 1:2014cv00222
Plaintiff:
James N Clark
Defendant:
Robin Sandy, David McClusky, J R Van Tassel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
