Cases 1 - 10 of 847
Faris v. Seu, et al.
as 1:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Robert Faris
Defendant:
Scott W. H. Seu, Constance H. Lau, Paul K. Ito and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Skillicorn v. Dickey et al
as 2:2024cv01074
Plaintiff:
Allen Skillicorn
Defendant:
Ginny Dickey, Brenda J Kalivianakis, Sharron Grzybowski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Michael N. Brown v. Azusa Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv03569
Plaintiff:
Michael N. Brown
Defendant:
Azusa Police Department, Los Angeles County Fire Battalion 16, City of Hope - West Covina Hematology and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02829
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Assad v. Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
George Assad
Defendant:
Scott W.H. Seu, Thomas B. Fargo, Peggy Y. Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Quinones v. Rossignal, et al.
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Julian R. Quinones
Defendant:
Peggy Rossignal and Salico Sean Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tai v. Seu et al
as 3:2024cv01198
Plaintiff:
Alexander Tai
Defendant:
Scott W. H. Seu, Thomas B. Fargo, Celeste A. Connors and others
(PS) Lopez v. Chew
as 2:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Peggy Lopez
Defendant:
Stephen Chew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
