Cases 1 - 10 of 57
King et al v. United States Small Business Administration et al
as 2:2024cv01448
Plaintiff:
Gary R King and Kathy E King
Defendant:
United States Small Business Administration and National Cooperative Bank I Incorporated
Folks Hess, PLLC v. King et al
as 2:2023cv01084
Plaintiff:
Folks Hess, PLLC
Defendant:
Wayde R. King, Betz Pools Limited, City National Bank, N.A. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Discover Bank and Heather L. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Action for Interplea
NOT USED
as 2:2023cv01085
Plaintiff:
Folks Hess, PLLC
Defendant:
Wayde R. King, Betz Pools Limited, City National Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Action for Interplea
King v. Multnomah County et al
as 3:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
Dontonio R. King
Defendant:
Multnomah County, Michael Reese, Steven Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Reese et al
as 3:2021cv01306
Plaintiff:
Dontonio R. King
Defendant:
Michael Reese, Deputy King and Multnomah County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez et al v. Acrylic Tank Manufacturing of Nevada et al
as 2:2021cv00079
Plaintiff:
Geova Zamora, Jesus Zamora, Jose Salazar Villalobos and others
Defendant:
Wayde R. King and Acrylic Tank Manufacturing of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gary King v. Mike Obenland, et al
as 20-35512
Respondent / Appellee:
MIKE OBENLAND
Petitioner / Appellant:
GARY R. KING
Respondent:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
King v. Key et al
as 3:2020cv05568
Defendant:
James Key and Stephen Sinclair
Plaintiff:
Gary R King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tran v. King
as 3:2020cv00304
Defendant:
Randy R King and Randy R. King
Plaintiff:
Lan Tran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. State of Washington
as 3:2018cv05722
Respondent:
State of Washington
Petitioner:
Gary R King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
