Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Anthony Penton v. Layton Johnson, et al
as 22-15665
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANTHONY PENTON
Defendant / Appellant:
LAYTON JOHNSON
Defendant:
S. HUBARD, K. POOL, J. WALKER and others
King v. Cottonflower Goodyear Community Association Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv02409
Defendant:
Cottonflower Goodyear Community Association Incorporated , Beth Mulcahy, Erin E McManis and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Edward King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Kilgore v. Virga et al
as 2:2011cv01822
Plaintiff:
Ivan Kilgore
Defendant:
Tim Virga, Arno Nappi, Tomeka Thorpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lionell Tholmer v. Cheryl Plilers, et al
as 10-17454
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LIONELL ERNEST THOLMER
Defendant - Appellee:
CHERYL K. PLILERS, T. ROSARIO, G. STRATTON and others
Lionell Tholmer v. Cheryl Plilers, et al
as 10-17142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LIONELL ERNEST THOLMER
Defendant - Appellee:
CHERYL K. PLILERS, T. ROSARIO, G. STRATTON and others
Tholmer v. Pliler, et al
as 2:2004cv01368
Plaintiff:
Lionell Ernest Tholmer
Defendant:
Cheryl Pliler , T Rosario , G Stratton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lionell Tholmer v. Cheryl Plilers, et al
as 09-17148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LIONELL ERNEST THOLMER
Defendant - Appellee:
CHERYL K. PLILERS, T. ROSARIO, G. STRATTON and others
Smith v. Salas et al
as 2:2009cv02680
Plaintiff:
Lafayette Antwone Smith
Defendant:
G. Salas, D. Caceres and R. Morrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manago v. Williams, et al
as 2:2007cv02290
Plaintiff:
Stewart Manago
Defendant:
Brad Williams, Jill Chapman, R. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mansanares v. Osterfeld et al
as 2:2007cv01473
Petitioner:
Miguel Mansanares
Respondent:
Osterfeld and Shelly Smith
Defendant:
James R Morrow and Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
