Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Darius Butler v. USDC-SAC
as 22-70247
Not Classified By Court:
In re: DARIUS BUTLER, J. CLARK KELSO, RICHARD KIRKLAND and others
Petitioner:
DARIUS BUTLER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
(PC) Butler v. Kelso et al
as 2:2022cv01301
Plaintiff:
Darius Butler
Defendant:
J. Clark Kelso, Richard Kirkland, Lisa Heintz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Adkins et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 2:2021cv01818
Plaintiff:
Melinda Adkins, Gerald Ed Andrews, Estate of Rich Romer and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, Monsanto Company, Solutia, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Hernandez v. Kibler et al
as 2:2021cv01629
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jesse Hernandez, Sr.
Defendant:
Brian Kibler, Richard Gray, Rafael Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adamek v. Gray et al
as 2:2021cv01335
Plaintiff:
Ewa Adamek
Defendant:
Richard Gray and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gray v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv09216
Defendant:
Phillip Morris USA, Inc., James Monsees, Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richard Gray, et al v. Ocwen Mortgage Servicing, Inc., et al
as 20-15793
Defendant / Appellee:
OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC and OCWEN MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIMBERLY GRAY and RICHARD GRAY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv01864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2016cv00982
Plaintiff:
Eileen Deutsch
Defendant:
Andrew L Schoelkopf, Michelle Storrs Booz, John Storrs Booz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Deutsch v. Schoelkopf et al
as 3:2016cv05561
Plaintiff:
Eileen Deutsch
Defendant:
Andrew L Schoelkopf , Michelle Storrs Booz , John Storrs Booz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
