Cases 1 - 10 of 10
(PC) Alem v. Barton et al
as 2:2021cv00751
Defendant:
A. J. Hernandez, P. S. Nowling, D Turner and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Alem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grigsby v. Pfeiffer, et al.
as 1:2017cv01384
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Grigsby
Defendant:
C. Pfeiffer, Robert Barton, Dennis M Toggart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyrone Wallace v. Sosa, et al
as 17-55218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee:
SOSA, CC II, RJD Appeals Coordinator, B. SELF, CC II, RJD Appeals Coordinator, ROBERT BARTON, I.G. Over CDCR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv05143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wallace v. Sosa et al
as 3:2016cv01501
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Wallace
Defendant:
Sosa, B. Self and Robert Barton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Adrian Moon et al v. Kimberly Seibel et al
as 2:2015cv07501
Defendant:
Robert Barton, Robert Barton, J Burke and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian Damico Moon and Johnny Potter
United States of America v. Barton
as 2:2008cv01157
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Robert Barton
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
United States of America v. Barton
as 2:2008mc00038
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Robert Barton
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Type:
Other Statutes
Siskiyou Regional v. USFS, et al
as 06-35332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SISKIYOU REGIONAL EDUCATION PROJECT
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, SCOTT CONROY, Forest Supervisor Siskiyou National Forest, LISA BARTON and others
Elliott v. drugstore.com inc et al
as 2:2004cv01474
Plaintiff:
Frederic J Elliott and Kathleen Keul
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Duft Group, Randall Simon, Jane Zebari and others
Defendant:
drugstore.com inc, Kal Raman, Robert Barton and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Peter M Neupert
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
