Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Allison v. Johnson
as 2:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
Ronald Joseph Allison
Defendant:
Eric Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv00939
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ronald Joseph Hill
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ronald Joseph Radke v. Jordan Terrell Carter et al
as 2:2021cv06168
Plaintiff:
Ronald Joseph Radke
Defendant:
Jordan Terrell Carter, Universal Music Group Inc. and Bravado International Group Merchandising Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Hill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv00525
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ronald Hill and Matthew Ronald Joseph Hill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Allison v. Clark County Detention Center
as 2:2020cv00216
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Ronald Joseph Allison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Ronald Fourhorn
as 18-35223
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RONALD JOSEPH FOURHORNS
Ronald Joseph Simmons v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2018cv00992
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Ronald Joseph Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Property Damage
Simmons v. Ford Motor Company
as 5:2017cv05705
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Ronald Joseph Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fourhorns v. USA
as 4:2016cv00072
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ronald Joseph Fourhorns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Pereira v. Swarthout
as 2:2014cv00530
Petitioner:
Ronald Joseph Pereira
Respondent:
Gary Swarthout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
