Cases 1 - 10 of 2,372
Avila v. Solis Enterprises 3 LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01180
Plaintiff:
Rita Lucila Amaya Avila
Defendant:
Solis Enterprises 3 LLC, Adolfo B Solis and Rosa M Solis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Dominguez v. Garland
as 24-3121
Petitioner:
ROSA AMALIA DOMINGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ace Kelley v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2024cv00929
Plaintiff:
Ace Kelley
Defendant:
County of Orange, Matthew Leflore, Arthur Tiscareno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ace Kuumealoha Kelly v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2024cv00933
Plaintiff:
Ace Kuumealoha Kelly
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ORANGE, Matthew Leflore, Arthur Tiscareno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Xochilt Rosas et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv01710
Plaintiff:
Xochilt Rosas and Jonathan Lested
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles and Does 1-100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Ortiz Garabito v. Garland
as 24-2611
Petitioner:
ROSA LINDA ORTIZ GARABITO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
McCleland v. Tempe, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
James F McCleland, II
Defendant:
Tempe, City of, Rosa Inchausti, Andrew Ching and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maya Hijazi et al v. Antony Blinken et al
as 2:2024cv03335
Plaintiff:
Maya Hijazi and Christopher Michael Rosa
Defendant:
ANTONY J BLINKEN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director UR M JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Rosas v. Jumio, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01716
Plaintiff:
Sara Rosas
Defendant:
Jumio, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
