Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Peters v. City of Hillsboro
as 3:2020cv00491
Defendant:
City of Hillsboro and Joseph Edwards
Plaintiff:
Richard Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stavrakis v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 6:2012cv01929
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Richard Peter Stavrakis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Bradford Technologies, Inc. v. NCV Software.com et al
as 3:2011cv04621
Defendant:
Metro National Title, LLC, NCV Software.com, Karma Technologies, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Appraisal World, Inc. and Jeffery Bradford
Plaintiff:
Bradford Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
DeArment v. Martel
as 3:2010cv01717
Petitioner:
Richard Peter DeArment
Respondent:
Michael Martel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01150
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Diane Bolen et al v. Mentor Corporation
as 2:2009cv00678
Plaintiff:
Diane Bolen, Diane Bolen, Diane Bolen and others
Defendant:
Mentor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DeArment v. RJ Donovan State Prison et al
as 3:2008cv02078
Plaintiff:
Richard Peter DeArment
Defendant:
RJ Donovan State Prison, Hall and - Whiting
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NOT USED
as 3:2007cv00422
Plaintiff:
David E. St. Pierre and Richard Peters
Defendant:
Bruce Bannister, Arthur E. Boynton, Joseph Brackbill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
St. Pierre et al v. Bannister et al
as 3:2007cv00423
Plaintiff:
David E. St. Pierre and Richard Peters
Defendant:
Bruce Bannister, Arthur E. Boynton, Joseph Brackbill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
