Cases 1 - 10 of 849
Christopher Powell v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2024cv01028
Plaintiff:
Christopher Powell
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino Department of Children and Family Services, County of San Bernardino Department of Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivas-Alvarado, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2947
Petitioner:
JOSE JUAN RIVAS-ALVARADO, ELSA VERONICA DIAZ-ALVARADO and DIEGO ALEXANDER RIVAS-DIAZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Aleman Mercado, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2784
Petitioner:
HARINTON HARVIN ALEMAN MERCADO and ANDERSON JOSUE ALEMAN RIVAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vasquez v. Fast Track Leasing LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00939
Plaintiff:
Christian Murillo Vasquez
Defendant:
Fast Track Leasing LLC and Deninson Dugarte Rivas
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32710 Federal Odometer Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Anthony Rivas v. Bryan D. Phillips
as 2:2024cv03231
Petitioner:
Anthony Rivas
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quintanilla-Rivas, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2293
Petitioner:
ROBERTO ANTONIO QUINTANILLA-RIVAS, HILDA LISSETH CANJURA-MANCIA, JORDAN MATTEO QUINTANILLA-CANJURA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rivas-Vizcarra v. Garland
as 24-2234
Petitioner:
JORGE ARIEL RIVAS-VIZCARRA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Rivas-Vizcarra
as 24-2128
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JORGE A. RIVAS-VIZCARRA
(PC) Moore v. Espinoza et al
as 3:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Marcus J. Moore
Defendant:
G. Espinoza, J. Moss, H. Para and others
Debtor:
Rivas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
