Cases 1 - 10 of 238
Cox v. Rosenblum et al
as 3:2024cv08105
Plaintiff:
Daniel John Cox
Defendant:
N Rosenblum, Marcie Mininberg and Barbara Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gabriel v. Kotek et al
as 3:2024cv00754
Plaintiff:
Ryan Dean Gabriel
Defendant:
Tina Kotek, Ellen Rosenblum and Meagan Aileen Flynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd. v. Rosenblum
as 6:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd.
Defendant:
Ellen F. Rosenblum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Foshee v. Lane County et al
as 6:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
P.R. Penny Foshee and Penny Foshee
Defendant:
Lane County, Attorney General Ellen F Rosenblum, Director Betsy Imholt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCrary v. Kotek et al
as 3:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Dathan Jude McCrary, Sr
Defendant:
Tina Kotek, Ellen F. Rosenblum, Mike Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Rosenblum
as 24-1274
Plaintiff:
IAN LEONARD CLARK
Defendant:
ELLEN ROSENBLUM, Attorney General
Hafner v. State of Oregon, et al.
as 24-616
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC HAFNER
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON, ELLEN ROSENBLUM, Oregon Attorney General, in her official capacity, TINA KOTEK, Oregon Governor, in her official capacity and others
Sawyer et al v. Marion County et al
as 3:2023cv01971
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Sawyer and Baltazar Ortiz
Defendant:
Marion County, Clackamas County, Ellen F. Rosenblum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hafner v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2023cv01859
Plaintiff:
Eric Hafner
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Ellen Rosenblum, Tina Kotek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Rosenblum
as 3:2023cv01667
Plaintiff:
Ian Leonard Clark
Defendant:
Ellen Rosenblum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
