Cases 1 - 10 of 502
Monge v. DH Brewing Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv01294
Plaintiff:
Natalie Monge
Defendant:
DH Brewing Incorporated, DH Enterprises Restaurants LLC, DH Enterprises Restaurants 2 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Tomasso v. Romano et al
as 5:2024cv03162
Plaintiff:
Jacopo Tomasso
Defendant:
Pasquale Romano, Rex S. Jackson, Rick Wilmer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Tonneyck et al v. ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv02619
Plaintiff:
Reony Tonneyck, Robert Hann and Ronald Hinton
Defendant:
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc., Roxanne Bowman, Elaine L. Chao and others
Michael Dotson et al v. CG Roxane LLC
as 2:2024cv02567
Plaintiff:
Michael Dotson, Tom M. Friedman and Adrian R. Bacon
Defendant:
CG Roxanne, LLC and CG Roxane LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00841
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Leavell v. Target Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Leavell
Defendant:
Target Corporation doing business as Target Store #0627 and "J. DOES" 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Dotson et al v. CG Roxanne, LLC
as 2:2024cv02521
Plaintiff:
Michael Dotson, Todd M. Friedman and Adrian R. Bacon
Defendant:
CG Roxanne, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Roy v. Romano et al
as 5:2024cv01281
Plaintiff:
Anand Roy
Defendant:
Pasquale Romano, Rex S. Jackson, Rick Wilmer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
