Cases 1 - 10 of 370
Salois v. Scheel et al
as 2:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Gene Salois
Defendant:
Jennifer Savage, Cynthia Bauman, Dr. Kevin Flanigan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
(PS) Smith et al v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2024cv02268
Defendant:
Jim Cooper, County of Sacramento, Michael Allen Savage and others
Plaintiff:
Rashid Deshawn Deary-Smith and Patricia Lynn Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Thomas et al v. Russel et al
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Allayah Thomas and Michael Denard
Defendant:
SAVAGE SERVICES CORPORATION and Daniel Wayne Russel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Savage v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv01161
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Karli M. Savage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Taylor v. 21 Savage
as 2:2024cv00966
Plaintiff:
Flat Out Society, Ltd. and Jermel Arcilicia Taylor
Defendant:
21 Savage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fregia v. Miranda, et al.
as 24-3501
Plaintiff:
MARK FREGIA
Defendant:
P.A. MIRANDA, SAVAGE and RIDGE
Taylor v. Craggs, et al.
as 24-3235
Plaintiff:
ISIAH TAYLOR
Defendant:
GENEVIEVE CRAGGS, TYLER SMITH, STEVEN B. WOLFSON and others
Savage Enterprises v. Wheeler et al
as 8:2024cv00992
Plaintiff:
Savage Enterprises
Defendant:
Christopher Wheeler, Preston Wheeler, Ambyr Freestone and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Craggs et al
as 2:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Isiah Taylor
Defendant:
Genevieve Craggs, Tyler Smith, Steven B. Wolfson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
