Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Charles Reed v. Sarah Kariko, et al
as 22-35616
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES VINCENT REED
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH KARIKO, Chief Medical Officer, Dept of Corrections, RYAN HERRINGTON, Medical Director, Stafford Creek, JEANETTE NEIBERT, Registered Health Information Technician, Stafford Creek CC and others
Charles Reed v. G. Hammond, et al
as 22-35355
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHARLES V. REED
Defendant / Appellant:
G. STEVEN HAMMOND, LARA STRICK and SARA KARIKO, FKA Sara Smith
Defendant:
ROB WEBER, WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RICHARD L. MORGAN and others
Reed v. Kariko et al
as 3:2020cv05580
Defendant:
Lara Strick, Jeannette Neibert, Elizabeth Eschbach and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Vincent Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv05993
Plaintiff:
Charles V Reed
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Richard Morgan, G. Steven Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Strick, M.D. v. United Retirement Plan Consultants, Inc.
as 2:2016cv08206
Plaintiff:
Richard Strick, M.D., Profit Sharing Plan and Richard A. Strick
Defendant:
United Retirement Consultants, Inc.
Strick v. City of Yelm
as 3:2016cv05230
Plaintiff:
Andrew Strick
Defendant:
City of Yelm
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Strick v. City of Hoquim
as 3:2016cv05228
Plaintiff:
Andrew Strick
Defendant:
City of Hoquim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strick v. Nisqually Delta River Entrance
as 3:2016cv05229
Plaintiff:
Andrew Strick
Defendant:
Nisqually Delta River Entrance
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Strick v. Pitts et al
as 3:2015cv05209
Plaintiff:
Andrew Strick
Defendant:
Doug Pitts, Ronald Brevig, Timothy Leo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Strick v. Lentz et al
as 3:2014cv05625
Plaintiff:
Andrew Strick
Defendant:
Lentz, Brian K Lynch, Timothy Leo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
