Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barron et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Bridget Barron and Tiffany Davis
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Postal Service, Louis DeJoy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Burnett v. Scanlon et al
as 4:2024cv00001
Petitioner:
Amber Marie Burnett
Respondent:
Alan Scanlon and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15684
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Need Essentials U.S.A. LLC v. Need Pty Ltd. et al
as 2:2023cv01265
Plaintiff:
Need Essentials U.S.A. LLC
Defendant:
Need Pty Ltd., NeedEssentials IP Pty Ltd., Ryan Scanlon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Alex Scanlon v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv08837
Petitioner:
Jason Alex Scanlon
Respondent:
United States of America, B. Birkholz and Collete Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
