Cases 1 - 10 of 1,220
Ziegler v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05381
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Scott Ziegler
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00650
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Scott v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05315
Plaintiff:
Evans J Scott
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Adams v. Jackson et al
as 4:2024cv05041
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scott Adams and Rooster
Defendant:
Robert Jackson, Ronald Haynes, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jane Doe M.K. v. Salesforce.com Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe M.K.
Defendant:
salesforce.com, inc., Backpage.com, LLC, Carl Ferrer and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1595 Civil Remedies: Sex trafficking of children or TVPRA
Su v. Continental Floral LLC et al
as 3:2024cv05220
Plaintiff:
Julie A Su
Defendant:
Continental Floral LLC, Jim Milgard, Jr., Scott Schauer and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hagos v. Cassidy et al
as 2:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Daniel Teklemariam Hagos
Defendant:
Scott Cassidy, Ryan Cody-Berry and Port of Seattle Police
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
