Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Cordova Carballo et al v. Barr et al
as 2:2020cv02196
Plaintiff:
Jose Rodolfo Castellanos, Abel De La Cruz, Jose Moises Silva Garcia and others
Defendant:
Pamela Lauer, William Barr, Gabriel C Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01315
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Glenn Clay v. Denise Lankford, et al
as 14-56513
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLENN EDWIN CLAY
Defendant - Appellee:
DENISE LANKFORD, SAVALA, Lt., CARLOS RAMOS and others
Glenn Clay v. Denise Lankford, et al
as 14-56295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLENN EDWIN CLAY
Defendant - Appellee:
DENISE LANKFORD, SAVALA, Lt., CARLOS RAMOS and others
Xanthi Gionis v. California Bureau For Private, et al
as 14-15666
Plaintiff - Appellant:
XANTHI GIONIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA BUREAU FOR PRIVATE POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, CONNIE BOUVIA, in her capacity as Enforement Chief for the Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS and others
Xanthi Gionis v. California Bureau For Private, et al
as 14-15415
Plaintiff - Appellant:
XANTHI GIONIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA BUREAU FOR PRIVATE POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, CONNIE BOUVIA, in her capacity as Enforement Chief for the Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS and others
Gionis v. Bureau For Private Postsecondary Education et al
as 2:2013cv00912
Plaintiff:
Xanthi Gionis
Defendant:
California Bureau For Private Postsecondary Education, Connie Bouvia, California Department of Consumer Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gionis v. Bureau For Private Postsecondary Education et al
as 2:2013at00480
Plaintiff:
Xanthi Gionis
Defendant:
Bureau For Private Postsecondary Education, Connie Bouvia, California Department of Consumer Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
