Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv05800
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Lembach #370051 et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 3:2026cv08157
Plaintiff: Frederick William Lembach, III and Trinity Rose Lembach
Defendant: Arizona, State of, Yavapai, County of, Dennis M McGrane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
McConnell Wagner Sykes + Stacey PLLC v. Firth et al
as 1:2026cv00404
Plaintiff: Chad M. McConnell Wagner Sykes + Stacey PLLC
Defendant: Steven Firth, Sheryl Herbert, Douglas Firth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv06587
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodruff v. Uber Technologies Inc et al
as 3:2026cv05954
Plaintiff: Stacey Alicia Woodruff
Defendant: Uber Technologies Inc, Rasier LLC and Rasier-CA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03879
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Stafford, et al. v. Taffet, et al.
as 26-2682
Plaintiff: DANA MICHAEL STAFFORD and HEATHER LEIGH STAFFORD
Defendant: ANDREW TAFFET, in his official and individual capacity, BRUCE ROSE, in his official and individual capacity, STACEY LAMARRE, in her official and individual capacity and others
Stacey v. Altman et al
as 3:2026cv03701
Defendant: OpenAI Foundation, Samuel Altman, OpenAI, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Mark Stacey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2026cv03954
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Stacey Frater v. E Mortgage Capital, Inc.
as 8:2026cv00884
Plaintiff: Stacey Frater
Defendant: E Mortgage Capital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?