Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Palmer v. Williams
as 2:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Amanda Terecia Palmer
Defendant:
Venecia T Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walsh v. Tristan et al
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Robert Walsh
Defendant:
David Tristan, Glenda Stewart, Moka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Minev, et al.
as 23-4155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL T. WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL MINEV, R. DONNELLY, B. EGERTON and others
Franklin v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Teron Franklin
Defendant:
State of Nevada, W. Gittere, Warden Lisa Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyshawn T. Williams v. Carl R Weber et al
as 2:2023cv04311
Plaintiff:
Tyshawn T. Williams
Defendant:
Carl R Weber, Karen R Thomas, Jaquavis Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Anthony T. Williams v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00218
Petitioner:
Anthony T. Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Williams v. USA
as 1:2023cv00187
Petitioner:
Anthony T. Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Anthony T. Williams v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv03334
Petitioner:
Anthony T. Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Williams v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv01921
Plaintiff:
John T Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Joseph Marsala v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 22-16260
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH AUGUST MARSALA
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of CDCR until late 2020, KATHLEEN ALLISON, Director of CDCR until late 2020, PATRICK EATON, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
