Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02540
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Winters v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2024cv02541
Plaintiff:
Tanya Winters
Defendant:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winters v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv02041
Plaintiff:
Tanya Winters
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01814
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Winters v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv01684
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Plaintiff:
Tanya Winters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winters v. F-N-F Construction et al
as 2:2024cv00880
Plaintiff:
Tanya Winters
Defendant:
F-N-F Construction, Zurich Insurance Company, Katie Hobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Winters v. Arizona Department of Economic Security et al
as 2:2024cv00878
Plaintiff:
Tanya Winters
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Economic Security, Katie Hobbs and Bradley D Beauchamp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Winters v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
Tanya Winters
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tanya Winters v. USDC-AZP
as 23-70029
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TANYA WINTERS, INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General
Petitioner:
TANYA WINTERS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Tanya Winters v. USDC-AZP
as 22-70245
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TANYA WINTERS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
TANYA WINTERS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
