Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Wade v. C and S Company Inc.
as 2:2024cv01561
Plaintiff:
Steven Wade
Defendant:
C and S Company Inc. and DOES 1-20 Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Allen v. Barrick Gold of North America, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00231
Defendant:
Turner Staffing Group, LLC and Barrick Gold of North America, Inc. doing business as Nevada Gold Mines LLC
Plaintiff:
Wade Allen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wade v. Walmart Inc.
as 2:2023cv01554
Plaintiff:
Eric Wade
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. doing business as Walmart Neighborhood Market
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Knight v. Cunningham
as 3:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Wade Alan Knight
Defendant:
Andrew Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade v. USA
as 2:2023cv01033
Petitioner:
Rickon Amyon Wade
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wade v. USA
as 2:2023cv00084
Petitioner:
Rickon Amyon Wade
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hornor v. Wade et al
as 2:2022cv01840
Plaintiff:
Justyn Hornor
Defendant:
Brandon Wade, Reflex Media, Inc. and Brandon Wey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Parker v. Wade et al
as 3:2022cv00477
Plaintiff:
Diondrae L. Parker
Defendant:
Wade, Dr Adamson, Michael Minev and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Elko County et al
as 3:2022cv00433
Plaintiff:
Wade Alan Knight
Defendant:
Elko County, Aitor Narvaiza, Lt Adrian Parry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. City of Elko et al
as 3:2022cv00384
Plaintiff:
Wade Alan Knight
Defendant:
Elko, City of, Ty Trouten, Andrew Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
