Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Rogers v. Taylor, et al.
as 24-6695
Defendant:
SHERGILL, Corrections Officer, King County Jail, EDWARD NORMAN, Food Services Supervisor for King County Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention, S. CHARLESTON, Corrections Program Specialist and others
Plaintiff:
RAY CLARENCE ROGERS
Rogers v. Reichard, et al.
as 24-6701
Defendant:
M. DRAKE, Sergeant, King County Jail, SEATTLE AND KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, CHU, Corrections Officer, King County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
RAY CLARENCE ROGERS
William Sebron King-Golding v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv08116
Plaintiff:
William Sebron King-Golding
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
In the Matter of William Jay King - SBN 199908
as 3:2022mc80038
Respondent:
William Jay King
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
King et al v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv01285
Plaintiff:
Caroline King, William Dee King, Tenesha King and others
Defendant:
USA and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
USA v. William King
as 19-30282
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM PATRICK KING
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kevin William LaShaun King v. United States et al
as 2:2018cv09479
Defendant:
Andrew McKinnon, Tye Ford, Roderick Sasis and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin William LaShaun King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Jamy King v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 2:2016cv05679
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
William Jamy King
McClary et al v. King et al
as 2:2015cv01579
Plaintiff:
Thomas McClary and Jason Williams
Defendant:
William A. King, Walter Orange, David Fish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01583
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
