Cases 71 - 80 of 8,771
Carter v. Headley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray Carter
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley and The State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Hamm (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
David P. Wilson
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Headley (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Glennie Dee Davis
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Villafana v. Marshall et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Villafana
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall, Nicki M. McFerrin, Justin Louvorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steward v. Johnson (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Randy Steward
Defendant:
Cassandra Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grady v. Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Larry Jerome Grady
Defendant:
Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alonso v. McClain et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Santiago Alonso
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guthrie v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 3)
as 3:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Matthew Guthrie
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gammons v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 3)
as 3:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Arthur Gammons
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Alonzo B. Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
