Cases 131 - 140 of 1,365
Dorsey v. Grissett (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00755
Plaintiff:
Michael Pernell Dorsey
Defendant:
Larry R. Grissett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Stevens et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00690
Defendant:
Chris Miranda, Matthew G. Stevens and James Hill
Plaintiff:
Ommie John Michael Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graves v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00797
Defendant:
Sherryl Price, Alabama Department of Corrections, Agent Mercado and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar Graves, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobble v. All Georgia Supreme Judges et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv00666
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eric Cobble and Daniel Castleberry
Defendant:
US District North Georgia, US Magistrate North Georgia, US Magistrate Chattanooga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ledbetter v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Parole et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00641
Defendant:
Lyn Head, Eddie Cook and Alabama Board of Pardons and Parole
Plaintiff:
James A. Ledbetter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00692
Defendant:
Michael Jones, Jr. and The City of Andalusia
Plaintiff:
Michael Tyson Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Hill et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00699
Defendant:
Matthew G. Stevens, James Hill, Keith Shehee and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary G. Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pate v. Woods et al (INMATE3)
as 2:2019cv00704
Defendant:
Xi Lee and Walter Woods
Plaintiff:
Frank Edwin Pate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobble v. United States of America et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv00665
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Georgia Department of Corrections, States Government Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Streeter et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00586
Defendant:
William Streeter and Joey Craig
Plaintiff:
Charles Eugene Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
